Tom Conley was always an irreverent reverend. Back 25 years ago, he was pastor of Northside Drive Baptist in Atlanta. Then, the highest-per capita in giving in the Southern Baptist convention. Located in the southern mecca's wealthiest in-town hood. It was also one of the numbered and now vanished liberal churches within the convention. They actually did exist once upon a time. This is a church where the ministers wore robes and came down the center isle in a processional. Where the Bible was read from a split chancel. A liturgical church with occasional liturgical dance. Common in mainline Protestant denominations. Not in Southern Baptist churches. This was a church where two staff members were a gay couple. Tom, like his contemporaries, both in the pews and pulpits, left the convention -- some sooner than later. They left as the "Onward Christian Soldiers" March of the Fundamentalist powers munched like PacMen -- the video game that was popular in the mid-80s, the early days of the 10-year take-over quest. Like many, he became an Episcopalian, and last I heard, was the priest of a small African American congregation. (Tom is white.)
In my mid-20's and already having worked for the communications division of four convention agencies, I had already caught on to the hoola about inerrancy -- the linchpin with which The Fundamentalists intended to lead Baptist flocks in ousting "the LIB-ER-RULS" teaching in the seminaries, Baptist colleges (one from which I graduated) and state conventions and agencies. (Inerrancy, for the unitiated reader, means belief that the Bible is factually correct and contains absolutely no errors whatsoever.) The takeover succeeded in about 1988, as pronounced table-top, with "Victory in Jesus" lead by the annual convention palimentarian in Cafe Du Monde in New Orleans. Few realized the real motive was the salacious desire of Jerry Falwell & Co. and Criswell's Dallas Theological Seminary to have a part of the convention power and coffers. And lock and step they marched through the last 30 years since The Reagan Revolution outed "The Silent Majority" and "The Religious Right" became a mighty force within the national political arena.
So, there was Tom, the irreverent reverend, back in the 80s, jesting at Christmastime about The Virgin Birth. Huh? Whuh? Holy Cow! Er. I mean The Virgin Birth IS the Sacred Cow! I listened. I questioned. I discussed. And then the argument began to fall into place with how my world view was changing from one of White Republicanism to one of a kinder-gentler Jesus who's love could be radically personified through social justice.
The point here is not whether Jesus was born of a virgin. I won't argue that. And it was also in this climatic time of my life that I began to believe in the concept of Universalism -- rejecting the concept of only one Path of Truth. And Tom's point, that Christmas season, which eventually became my point is that we've been EMPHASIZING the miraculous birth, the immaculate conception, for years. Something the Early Church, perhaps, conceived (no pun intended) to make their God more special to the potential unsaved pagans. I never knew then anyone ever questioned it. Turns out lots have and still do. Regardless, here's the point I keep saying I'm going to get to:
The Prophet Jesus could have been born at the Ritz, at the finest hotel, the most glorious digs royalty deserved. But, instead, being the radical he was, he chose to be born an immigrant of a scared, unwed teen in a stinky stall amid animals in a bed of scratchy straw. Meaning...this God came to identify with whom he'd later speak of as "the least of these," "the meek," "the mild," "the hungry," "the naked," "the poor." Would we, the people, all of us, really identify with a prince born in posh digs? I think not. The birth, virgin or not, I don't care. That lowly, dirt-poor-and-stinking-barn birth symbolizes The Great Teacher Jesus' oneness. Oneness with the people. All People.
And that. To Me. Is. The True Meaning. Of Christmas.